IT Spot

Focusing on Information Technology

Windows Home Server release issues

HP’s MediaSmart Server has been pushed back.

(Credit: CNET)

When last we left Microsoft’s Windows Home Server software, it was off to manufacturing and we expected to see WHS-equipped hardware show up at our doorstep shortly thereafter. After a post on Microsoft’s official Home Server blog, we get the company line as to why we haven’t seen HP’s MediaSmart Server yet. As follows:

“We’ve identified a number of ways to make the product even better since the initial release, As with most Microsoft products, updates to Windows Home Server will be automatically available throughout the lifecycle of the product and the WHS team is working on an update that will be available in September. These updates will enhance the usability and improve the out-of-the-box experience of home server solutions. Additional updates will occur over the lifespan of the product as we receive feedback from the user community, our hardware partners and software partners. Microsoft’s current plan is to make this update available as part of the monthly Windows Updates process in September.

HP has decided to include these first software updates in their MediaSmart Server. Both HP and Microsoft believe that these updates are in the best interest of potential customers and will insure the best out-of-the-box experience. All of our Windows Home Server partners and customers will automatically receive the update once posted to Windows Update.”

Will Velocity Micro brings its Home Server to market first?

(Credit: Velocity Micro)

The post doesn’t mention the other Windows Home Server hardware partners, like Medion, Gateway, La Cie, and Velocity Micro. I assume they’re all now weighing whether it’s worth coming first to market against possible fallout from shipping with enough known issues to slow down a competitor. Any want to enlighten us as to the specific issues? Our experiences with a few WHS betas were fine, but then we didn’t qualify our test bed to move 100,000 units.

Source: CNET News.com - Business Tech

August 31, 2007 Posted by prolink | Uncategorized | | No Comments

IP Telephony startups attract cash

Despite SunRocket’s recent implosion, venture capitalists are hot to invest in voice over IP startups.

A company called Jaxtr announced Tuesday that it’s raised $10 million. The company, which hopes to emulate the success of eBay’s Skype, actually attracted some of the same investors as Skype. Draper Richards, Draper Fisher Jurvetson, and Mangrove Capital, all early stage investors in Skype, contributed to Jaxtr’s first round of funding.

Jaxtr is one of a growing number of IP telephony startups hoping to make it big. These companies are leaning more toward Skype’s business model as a complimentary voice service rather than billing themselves as a replacement to traditional telephone services. This was the strategy that Vonage and SunRocket took when launched. Now SunRocket is out of business, and Vonage is gasping for air.

But the new crop of startups, which incorporate the existing telephone or cellular phone networks into their use cases, are cleaning up in terms of funding. Rebtel has raised $20 million, Truphone got $23.4 million, Jajah score about $20 million and Ashton Kucher’s Ooma raised $27 million.

Jaxtr allows people to make phone free international calls from their cell phones by assigning users with a local number. Callers use this number, which routes calls over the Internet. Jaxtr’s CEO Konstantin Guericke co-founded LinkedIn, and the service actually incorporates social networking by creating a widget that allows people to embed the number on their blog or social network profile, such as MySpace and Facebook.

Source: CNET News.com - Business Tech

August 31, 2007 Posted by prolink | Uncategorized | | No Comments

Airborne Laser passes target test

Airborne Laser

This is how the Pentagon envisions the Airborne Laser in action.

(Credit: U.S. Missile Defense Agency)

The Airborne Laser has taken another step forward in its long slog off the drawing board and into the Pentagon’s arsenal.

The first-of-its-kind 747-400F this month completed a series of low-power test flights, using onboard infrared sensors to locate “an instrumented target board” on an Air Force NC-135E aircraft. Once the Airborne Laser found the target, two solid-state illuminator lasers tracked the target and assessed atmospheric conditions–the later function being key to plotting a path to the target for the weapons laser. Since the high-energy COIL (chemical oxygen iodine laser) weapons system has yet to be installed, a low-power surrogate laser fired at the NC-135E.

The accomplishment, lead contractor Boeing said Friday, is proof positive that the ABL’s battle management and beam control/fire control systems can support the plane’s ultimate mission: intercepting a ballistic missile and destroying it in flight.

If all goes according to plan, and that’s a big if, the ABL with a fully installed and tested high-energy laser will go up against a soaring ballistic missile in a test in 2009.

Many of the ifs are technical, but there are political considerations as well. The ABL program has been an expensive undertaking over the years, dating back to the mid-1990s. According to a report issued this summer by the Congressional Research Service, about $4.3 billion has been spent on the program so far (with $630 million allocated in the current fiscal year), but both the House and the Senate seem set to give the Bush Administration substantially less than it’s asking for the upcoming fiscal year.

In time, the government is looking to field as many as seven ABL aircraft.

For the Airborne Laser, Boeing is working with fellow defense contractor Northrop Grumman, which is building the high-energy laser. But when it comes to truck-mounted laser weapons, the two companies are competing.

Source: CNET News.com - Business Tech

August 31, 2007 Posted by prolink | Uncategorized | | No Comments

Germany wants to sic spyware on terror suspects

In the name of nabbing terrorists, the German government is floating a plan that would permit authorities to plant spyware on suspects’ hard drives through e-mail messages appearing to stem from official sources, according to various news reports out of Berlin this week.

The proposal, which has not yet been made public but was leaked in part to some German news outlets, is reportedly the brainchild of Interior Minister Wolfgang Schaeuble. He’s pushing for its inclusion in a broader security law under consideration by Chancellor Angela Merkel’s coalition government. The spyware provision is a response to a federal court decision earlier this year that frowned upon secret remote searches of computers, according to a recent report by the Associated Press.

But left-wing party members and civil liberties advocates are railing against the idea as a potential invasion of citizens’ privacy, according to AP and Agence-France Presse reports. One Left Party Parliament member told AFP she also feared the policy would make citizens fearful to open e-mails from government sources.

Advocates of the plan, for their part, have tried to assuage fears about abuse of the technique. They have told reporters they would use the so-called “Trojan horse” spyware in a targeted way and would do so only with court approval.

Police use of spyware, as readers of CNET News.com should know, is hardly a new idea. Recent cases in the United States have revealed agents with the FBI and the DEA have installed spyware–in both cases, with a court’s permission–as part of investigations.

It was not clear how the German software would operate, although the news reports indicate the goal is to snoop on a suspect’s hard drive data and Internet activity. An FBI tool called CIPAV, for example, can immediately report back to the government a computer’s Internet Protocol address, Ethernet MAC address, “other variables, and certain registry-type information.” Then, for the next 60 days, it will record Internet Protocol addresses visited but not the contents of the communications.

The widespread availability of spyware-detection software could arguably make it more difficult for any government to hide such a scheme from a tech-savvy suspect. In a recent CNET News.com survey of 13 leading anti-malware vendors, not one acknowledged cooperating unofficially with government agencies–at least U.S. ones–to mask the presence of police spyware. Some, however, indicated they may keep quiet if ordered by a court to do so.

Source: CNET News.com - Business Tech

August 31, 2007 Posted by prolink | Uncategorized | | No Comments

Embassy e-mails hacked

Yesterday, Dan Egerstad, Swedish computer security consultant, posted online the usernames, passwords and server addresses necessary to access to up to 100 e-mail accounts worldwide. He says he used an unnamed vulnerability to obtain the user name and passwords for up to 1,000 e-mail accounts, including some for major US and UK corporations.

Egerstad told Computer Sweden, “I did an experiment and came across the information by accident.” He said he tried contacting a few of the administrators responsible for the sites he posted, but so far they have all ignored him. At least one account has since changed its password.

Source: CNET News.com - Business Tech

August 31, 2007 Posted by prolink | Uncategorized | | No Comments

Netvibes goes mobile, for real this time

Netvibes’ new super-fast mobile version.

Single-page aggregator Netvibes quietly launched a mobile version of its site in February. It was a bit of a hack: If you created a “mobile” tab, and then when you visited Netvibes from your mobile, the feeds you put in that tab would show up.

Today, Netvibes has gone to the next step with two new mobile sites. The lightweight mobile version of the site, m.netvibes.com, doesn’t require any special tabs. On your mobile you can select any tab you’ve created on your desktop or laptop, and it displays almost everything, formatted for the small device. Horizontal scrolling is dropped, for example, and everything goes vertical. However, some widgets don’t work, and they just don’t show up. I couldn’t display my Flickr photos, for example.

The iPhone version of the same page. Better. But slower.

iPhone users get a more capable site, which, since it relies on the capable Safari browser, displays widgets with more fidelity and does a good job with graphics. It’s also looks really sharp on an iPhone display.

Mobile Netvibes seems to default to the lightweight site on Windows phones, and to the iPhone site if you’re running the Safari browser, but you can override this and visit the iPhone version directly at iphone.netvibes.com.

Either way, this new capability adds a lot of functionality. I think it makes the service a great RSS reader (among other things) for on-the-go users.

Source: CNET News.com - Business Tech

August 31, 2007 Posted by prolink | Uncategorized | | No Comments

Backing up email

Email, for many of us, is very
important and accumulates forever, making it a large mess when it comes
to backing it up.

The importance of my
email snuck on me. Once upon a time, I opened my old
reliable email program and was confronted with an
error message. The net effect of the problem was that the last
four days of incoming mail had disappeared from my inbox. This was, for
me, a very big deal. In large part, my inbox is my To Do list. As a
consultant, my incoming email is too important to ever allow a repeat
of this problem.

Suffice it say, this made me
think about backing up my email perhaps more than most people.

The need for reliable and redundant email backups dictates the use of a
client side email program such as Outlook Express, Thunderbird or Eudora. Web based email systems such as Gmail, Yahoo mail and
Hotmail, have their advantages but backup is not one of them.

To begin with, I
have an external hard disk attached to my computer and every morning I
copy all of my email from the internal hard disk to the external one.
This is a destructive backup. That is, every morning the backup is
totally re-created on the external hard disk. The advantage of
this is that I never have to worry about running out of space on the
external hard disk. The dis-advantage is that I can’t use it to recover
email from three days ago. Everything is a trade-off when it comes to
backups.

Also, this backup doesn’t manipulate the
original files in any way; they aren’t combined, compressed or
re-formatted. Thus, I can easily copy email from the external hard disk
back to my computer and use it immediately. And simple means there is
less to go wrong. The downside is that the backup is the same size as
the original, but external hard disks have a huge capacity and
tranferring files over a USB2 connection is more than fast enough for
this purpose.

One of my prime rules for backups is
to never to copy a file while it’s
in use. That is, I never copy email when my email
program is running and never copy Word documents when Word is
running. The morning backup of my email is scheduled
by the Windows scheduler and since it runs first thing after Windows
starts up my email program is not running.

This
however, is just a starting point as it still allows for the loss of an
entire day’s worth of email. To cut my potential loss in half, I also
backup my email mid-day. This backup is also scheduled
using the Windows scheduler,  but it’s very
different from the morning backup. Rather than backing up all my email,
here I only copy the most important folders (the inbox
and a few others). Also, the backup is sent via FTP to an
online file storage company.

This limits my worst case scenario to the loss of a half days worth
of email. It also means that no matter what happens to my computer and
the external hard disk, I always have the most important email stored a
thousand miles away. And since my email is sensitive, online
storage space is limited and uploads are slow, I
compress, encrypt and password protect
the email before it leaves my computer and travels
over the Internet to the file storage company.

The
mid-day backup is different in other ways too. For one, all
the email is combined into a single file. In addition, I keep multiple
copies of the mid-day backup. The backup program tags the daily file
with the current day of the week. Thus every backup made on a Monday
will result in the same file name. When the backup is sent offsite, the
backup program is instructed to delete older versions of files with the
same names. I end up with seven off-site copies of my most
important folders and, again, don’t have to worry about running out of
space.

Finally, once a month I compress and
encrypt all my email and send it off-site to another file storage
company.

No one approach is right for
everyone. For example, I have chosen to limit my worst-case loss to a
half day of email which may not work for you.
And my approach requires constantly filing email in
folders, something not everyone wants to do.

After
living with the above scheme for a while, I modified it a bit to
prevent the most important folders from growing in size forever.

I manually archive the inbox, sent folder and a few other important
folders by moving old messages to new folders tagged with the year. For
example, all the messages in my inbox from 2005 are stored in a folder called inbox2005. Likewise there
are folders called inbox2004, inbox2006 and inbox2007. A couple months ago
I moved messages in my inbox from January through March of this year into
the inbox2007 folder. Later this year, I’ll again move old
messages from this year into it.

With this
approach, I can eventually delete the inbox2004 and inbox 2005
folders from my computer. They remain on the external hard
disk and are also stored off-site if need be. Without some type of
archiving scheme, email will grow forever. I find that manipulating a
few folders this way a couple times a year is well worth
the effort.
 
Of course, you can’t use
this approach, or anything remotely similar, unless your email program
stores each folder as a separate file (or two). But who would use an
email program that stored all your mail in a single file? :-)

Michael Horowitz is an independent computer consultant and the author of several classes on Defensive Computing. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network.

Source: CNET News.com - Business Tech

August 31, 2007 Posted by prolink | Uncategorized | | No Comments

Cell phones could trigger cancer

Just when you thought it was safe to talk on your cell phone.

Now some scientists say there is a chance that talking on a mobile phone for as little as 10 minutes could trigger changes in the brain that are associated with cancer, according to a story published on Thursday by the The Daily Mail.

The article said that researchers at the Weizmann Institute of Science in Israel discovered that exposure to even low levels of radiation from mobile handsets could interfere with how brain cells divide, thus causing tumors.

But the scientists said there was no evidence to suggest a definite link between radiation from mobile phones and cancer. Instead the study merely suggests that certain cells can react to cell phone radiation. A health expert in the article said the effect was “unlikely to cause cancer.”

This isn’t the first time that studies have implicated cell phones in causing cancer. Back in 2006, the U.S. Federal Drug Administration said it would review wireless-phone safety based on findings in a study conducted by the Swedish National Institute that raised concerns about a heightened risk of brain cancer. Researchers found an increased risk of cancerous tumors growing in people’s heads who were heavy cell phone users.

In any case, it looks like one more thing I’ll have to worry about when it comes to reducing my risk of cancer along with reusing plastic water bottles, microwaving food in plastic containers, and using deodorant with antiperspirant.

Source: CNET News.com - Business Tech

August 31, 2007 Posted by prolink | Uncategorized | | No Comments

Apple slaps back at NBC Universal

Disagreements between Apple and NBC Universal escalated Friday as Apple announced that it won’t sell NBC’s shows for the upcoming television season.

The move comes a day after The New York Times reported that NBC Universal would not renew its agreement to make its TV shows available for download on iTunes.

Apple said in a press release that the dispute over price came after the iPod maker “declined to pay more than double the wholesale price for each NBC TV episode.”

This, according to Apple, would have boosted the per-episode price of NBC shows on iTunes from $1.99 to $4.99.

The move by Apple is an attempt to preempt a possible NBC pullout when their contract runs out in December.

“Since NBC would withdraw their shows in the middle of the television season, Apple has decided to not offer NBC TV shows for the upcoming television season beginning in September,” Apple said in its statement.

Source: CNET News.com - Business Tech

August 31, 2007 Posted by prolink | Uncategorized | | No Comments

Court tosses $11 million judgment against Spamhaus

At least for now, Spamhaus, the popular British spam-blacklisting organization, won’t have to cough up $11.7 million as part of a spat with an Illinois e-mail marketing company.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit on Thursday vacated a lower court’s decision last fall to award the damages and to impose an injunction, which required the organization to cease causing any e-mail sent by e360insight or Linhardt to be “blocked, delayed, altered, or interrupted in any way” and to publish an apology (click here for a PDF of the opinion).

(Credit: spamhaus.org)

The three-judge panel concluded the lower court’s action was “overbroad” because it had not conducted an “extensive” or “substantial” enough inquiry into the situation before calculating its damage award and imposing other conditions on Spamhaus. The district judge based the damages solely on a sworn statement from Linhardt about his estimated lost future profits, which contained “no information whatsoever to support a finding that such future profits were certain prior to Spamhaus’ act,” the appeals court opinion said.

By sending the case back to the district court for further proceedings, the court did not, however, seem to take issue with the lower court’s ruling that Spamhaus was liable under U.S. law. That runs contrary to the U.K.-based organization’s position.

Here’s a little history: e360insight and Linhardt sued Spamhaus early last year, accusing the organization of wrongly placing the company on its “Register Of Known Spam Operations,” a list reserved for people or businesses that have been knocked off at least three Internet service providers for violating their terms of use, according to the appeals court opinion. Spamhaus has steadfastly maintained it has ample evidence that Linhardt is a spammer, although neither his name nor his company’s name seemed to show up on that list as of press time. (The e360insight Web site also wasn’t loading.)

But the case never got to that point. The multimillion-dollar judgment came about by default after Spamhaus voluntarily dropped its defense–largely on the grounds that it was a British company and therefore wasn’t subject to U.S. laws or court orders.

“As spamming is illegal in the U.K., an Illinois court ordering a British organization to stop blocking incoming Illinois spam in Britain goes contrary to U.K. law which orders all spammers to cease sending spam in the first place,” Spamhaus wrote in a lengthy explanation posted to its Web site at the time.

The case took on a new twist last October, when 360insight asked the federal judge presiding over that case to order the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, or ICANN, and registrar Tucows to suspend Spamhaus’ domain name registration. But ICANN, for one, said it couldn’t grant that request.

Attempts to reach Lindhardt were unsuccessful. Spamhaus representatives did not respond immediately to requests for comment.

Wired News first reported the verdict on Thursday evening.

Source: CNET News.com - Business Tech

August 31, 2007 Posted by prolink | Uncategorized | | No Comments