IT Spot

Focusing on Information Technology

Top Yahoo shareholders could support Microsoft


Top Yahoo shareholders could support Microsoft

Yahoo is calling on Microsoft to bump up its buyout bid, but the trouble is a number of the Internet giant’s largest investors own shares in both stocks.

And, in a number of cases, Microsoft accounts for a larger slice between the two, which could dampen Yahoo’s efforts to generate strong investor momentum in calling for a substantially higher price, according to a report released Friday by RiskMetrics Group.
In effect, it’s like asking these large investors to bid against themselves.

“This is the pressure that Yahoo is under,” said Chris Young, RiskMetrics director of M&A research. “If the Yahoo investors owned fewer Microsoft shares than Yahoo, then the pressure would be different.”

For example, Yahoo’s largest investor, Capital Group’s Capital Research Global Investors and Capital World Investors, managed 523.6 million shares of Microsoft, compared with 154.8 million shares of Yahoo, as of December 31.

And T. Rowe Price, which ranks among Yahoo’s top 10 investors, owned 136.5 million shares of Microsoft compared with 22.8 million shares of Yahoo, during the same time period.

“Investors who own both Yahoo and Microsoft will probably support Yahoo asking for a sweetener (to the deal), but will probably tell Yahoo don’t rake Microsoft over the coals.”

–Chris Young, director of M&A research, RiskMetrics

According to RiskMetrics, 90 percent of all Yahoo institutional investors also own shares in Microsoft. And of this group, 15 of the top 20 Yahoo institutional investors own more Microsoft than Yahoo.

RiskMetrics, which also operates ISS Governance Services, provides proxy advice to 1,900 clients that range from pension funds to hedge funds to mutual funds.

Some investment firms, such as Fidelity, allow each portfolio manager to vote their fund’s shares independently, rather than taking a companywide approach, proxy solicitors say. As a result, Fidelity could have one fund that is heavier in Microsoft vote one way on a merger, while another Fidelity fund votes differently.

The long-held theory in mergers and acquisitions is that fund families will vote their shares based on the net benefit they receive as a firm, Young said.

“Investors who own both Yahoo and Microsoft will probably support Yahoo asking for a sweetener (to the deal), but will probably tell Yahoo don’t rake Microsoft over the coals,” Young said.

Proxy solicitors expressed similar sentiments, noting that in the past two weeks since Microsoft launched its unsolicited bid for $31 a share, Yahoo investors who have duel ownership in the stocks have had time to assess the affect on their respective portfolios.

“The investors are very adept at playing both ends against the middle to extract the best value,” said one proxy solicitor. “They’re probably telling Yahoo to try to get the best offer you can, but let’s not lose the deal.”

Matrix Asset Advisors falls into that category. Matrix, which manages $1.6 billion in assets, has been a longtime holder of Microsoft shares and is a recent owner of Yahoo.

Matrix, which acquired Microsoft shares when it was trading in the mid-$20 a share range, cast an eye at Yahoo in January, purchasing 435,000 shares.

And while its Yahoo position falls short of its ownership in Microsoft, Matrix supports Yahoo seeking a higher price.

“Microsoft’s current price is essentially fair. It gives Microsoft some wiggle room if they want to pay a little bit more,” said David Katz, chief investment adviser for Matrix Asset Advisors. “We don’t think Yahoo is worth $40 a share, but does it make sense at $33 to $35? Under the right circumstances, that would do right for all sides.”

And while Microsoft’s buyout bid has put pressure on its share price since it was announced, Katz said he believes that will be for the short-term. He added that the software giant’s share price will benefit in the long-run with a Yahoo merger.

“We think the Microsoft board is focused on having a dominant franchise in the Internet search and ad space,” Katz said. “This is where they have spent a lot of money but have not had a lot of traction. This is their best shot at becoming a meaningful player.”

Yahoo is reportedly in talks with News Corp. and AOL. But Katz said he hopes Yahoo will ultimately do the right thing to help its value sooner than later. He noted the longer Yahoo remains in a limbo, the more its value will be impaired.

Yahoo and News Corp. are reportedly discussing exchanging some of News Corp.’s assets, such as its popular MySpace.com and other Fox Interactive Media group Web sites, in exchange for a large investment stake in Yahoo, according to a report in The Wall Street Journal.

Some observers speculate that News Corp. might not be the only media company with an interest in Yahoo.

“I’m sure there are similar (discussions) in the offing with a few of the other big-media companies,” a source close to the matter told CNET News.com when asked about the reported News Corp.-Yahoo talks. But the source suggested that they probably won’t get in the way. It’s “unlikely they amount to much, but there is something there.”

As Yahoo and Microsoft evaluate the shareholder base of the Internet company, they will be taking note of who owns stock in both, how those shares are weighted, and how each of those respective investment firms tend to handle voting matters, such as on a fund-by-fund basis or by taking a firmwide approach, proxy solicitors say.

And once that analysis is completed, the tough task begins in assessing whether to raise a bid, launch a tender offer, or kick off a proxy fight for directors’ seats, proxy solicitors said.

If they do a proxy fight or tender offer, it could be an eight-month battle, with Yahoo losing a number of employees, as well as a distraction for both companies, proxy solicitors say.

Said one proxy solicitor: “There is a time value of money.”

CNET News.com’s Caroline McCarthy contributed to this report.

Source: CNET News.com - Business Tech

February 15, 2008 Posted by prolink | Uncategorized | | No Comments

News.com Extra: Nanoscanning: Now we can see atoms

Also: Dating faux-pas: Stealing other people’s profiles. See what people are saying on News.com Extra.

February 15, 2008 Posted by prolink | Uncategorized | | No Comments

Report: Yahoo board divided over Microsoft bid

Microsoft’s billions appear to have Yahoo’s board divided, according to a report Friday in the New York Post.

On Monday, Yahoo sent out a press release stating that the board had “unanimously” rejected the bid.

But some of the company’s independent directors apparently don’t detect a solid alternative to selling to Redmond and see CEO Jerry Yang as taking an “emotional” anything-but-Microsoft approach.

In one camp are Yahoo Chairman Ray Bostock and billionaire investor Ron Burkle, according to the newspaper, while Yang appears to have support from Softbank’s Eric Hippeau and Activision CEO Robert Kotick.

“The emotional part of Yang would rather do anything but sell to Microsoft, but he doesn’t have the cards to come up with a value-creating, competitive alternative for shareholders,” an unnamed source told the Post.

Yang’s approach is also said to have some independent directors worried about lawsuits that they are not doing their fiduciary duty by negotiating with Microsoft.

It’s worth noting that in Yahoo’s Monday press release, the company noted that its independent directors have obtained separate legal advisers from the company’s overall counsel.

Source: CNET News.com - Business Tech

February 15, 2008 Posted by prolink | Uncategorized | | No Comments

Underexposed blog: Links of the day

Source: CNET News.com - Business Tech

February 15, 2008 Posted by prolink | Uncategorized | | No Comments

Secret recipe inside Intel’s latest competitor


Secret recipe inside Intel's latest competitor

It works like an Intel chip, but looks like the Cell processor.

That’s one way of describing the energy-efficient multiple core processors being devised by secretive Montalvo Systems. The Santa Clara, Calif.-based company has come up with a design for a chip for portable computers and devices that–when finished and manufactured–will theoretically be capable of running the same software as chips from Intel or Advanced Micro Devices.

Montalvo’s chips, however, will fundamentally differ from the latest Core or Opteron processors from Intel and AMD in that the cores on its chip won’t be symmetrical, i.e. identical to each other. Instead, Montalvo’s chips will sport a mix of high-performance cores and lower-performance cores on the same piece of silicon, similar to the Cell chip devised by IBM, Toshiba, and Sony, according to sources close to the company.

By merging asymmetrical cores onto the same piece of silicon, Montalvo can cut power consumption by dishing applications that don’t require a lot of computing firepower onto less-powerful, more energy-efficient cores. Applications could conceivably also be shuttled to low-power cores after their need for high-performance elapses: Microsoft Outlook, for instance, requires a burst of performance during the launch phase but far less once it’s running.

Asymmetrical cores can also provide better performance on applications such as video if programmed for that purpose, say proponents of the architecture. The Cell processor became the first chip to successfully champion this idea. The Cell consists of a primary microprocessor core and an array of “synergistic processing elements” that can be programmed to perform discrete tasks like managing networking or video streaming.

Cell chips have primarily been used inside Sony’s PlayStation 3, but IBM has inserted Cell chips in some server blades. Toshiba plans to put the chip inside TVs and may put it inside PCs. (While the initial Cell comes with eight synergistic cores, chips can be made with fewer.) Mercury Computer Systems has also adopted Cell for some computers.

Montalvo has not stated whether it has adopted an asymmetrical core to save power, boost performance on media applications, or both. In fact, the company doesn’t say anything at all. The closest it has come to a public statement are shirts handed out to employees saying that the company can’t say what it is up to. Montalvo declined to comment for this story.

The somewhat different, asymmetrical nature of Montalvo’s chip in part helps explain why investors have put more than $73 million into the Sisyphean task of taking on Intel. Montalvo wants to land its chips into all sorts of portable computers: notebooks, handheld devices such as the OQO, and ornate smartphones. Several companies, however, have tried this and failed because of the daunting nature of trying to compete against Intel. Cyrix, Transmeta, Rise–none of them ever lived up to its advance billing. Only AMD has survived, and AMD has lost more money that it has made in its 30-year plus existence.

Montalvo is funded by people who’ve tangled or been entangled with Intel before too. NEA-IndoUS’s Vinod Dham, who sits on Montalvo’s board, was one of Intel’s chief chip architects during the Pentium era. He then went to NexGen, which designed an Intel-compatible chip, and then AMD when it bought NexGen.

Montalvo’s CEO is Matt Perry, who also served as chief executive of Transmeta, which once tried to take on Intel in notebooks but now largely concentrates on technology licensing. Peter Song, Montalvo’s chief architect, earlier founded a company called MemoryLogix, which tried to build low-power Intel-compatible chips. Other current and former employees include Greg Favor (formerly of NexGen and AMD) and Mike Yamamura. (CNET Networks blogger Peter Glaskowsky is chief systems architect for Montalvo and is listed as a co-inventor on two published Montalvo patent applications, but he was not involved in any way in this story. CNET is the publisher of News.com.)

Some of Montalvo’s patent applications can be viewed here.

Although it has designed a chip, Montalvo has not yet produced a chip based on its designs.

Source: CNET News.com - Business Tech

February 15, 2008 Posted by prolink | Uncategorized | | No Comments

The secret recipe inside Intel’s latest competitor


The secret recipe inside Intel's latest competitor


It works like an Intel chip, but looks like the Cell processor.

That’s one way of describing the energy-efficient multiple core processors being devised by secretive Montalvo Systems. The Santa Clara, Calif.-based company has come up with a design for a chip for portable computers and devices that–when finished and manufactured–will theoretically be capable of running the same software as chips from Intel or Advanced Micro Devices.

Montalvo’s chips, however, will fundamentally differ from the latest Core or Opteron processors from Intel and AMD in that the cores on its chip won’t be symmetrical, i.e. identical to each other. Instead, Montalvo’s chips will sport a mix of high-performance cores and lower-performance cores on the same piece of silicon, similar to the Cell chip devised by IBM, Toshiba, and Sony, according to sources close to the company.

By merging asymmetrical cores onto the same piece of silicon, Montalvo can cut power consumption by dishing applications that don’t require a lot of computing firepower onto less-powerful, more energy-efficient cores. Applications could conceivably also be shuttled to low-power cores after their need for high-performance elapses: Microsoft Outlook, for instance, requires a burst of performance during the launch phase but far less once it’s running.

Asymmetrical cores can also provide better performance on applications such as video if programmed for that purpose, say proponents of the architecture. The Cell processor became the first chip to successfully champion this idea. The Cell consists of a primary microprocessor core and an array of “synergistic processing elements” that can be programmed to perform discrete tasks like managing video streaming or manage networking.

Cell chips have primarily been used inside Sony’s PlayStation3, but IBM has inserted Cell chips in some server blades. Toshiba plans to put the chip inside TVs and may put it inside PCs. (While the initial Cell comes with eight synergistic cores, chips can be made with fewer.) Mercury Computer Systems has also adopted Cell for some computers.

Montalvo has not stated whether it has adopted an asymmetrical core to save power or boost performance on media applications or both. In fact, the company doesn’t say anything at all. The closest it has come to a public statement are shirts handed out to employees saying that the company can’t say what it is up to. Montalvo declined to comment for this story.

The somewhat different, asymmetrical nature of Montalvo’s chip in part helps explain why investors have put more than $73 million into the Sisyphean task of taking on Intel. Montalvo wants to land its chips into all sorts of portable computers: notebooks, handheld devices such as the OQO, and ornate smartphones. Several companies, however, have tried this and failed because of the daunting nature of trying to compete against Intel. Cyrix, Transmeta, Rise–none of them ever lived up to its advance billing. Only AMD has survived, and AMD has lost more money that it has made in its 30-year plus existence.

The company is funded by people who’ve tangled with Intel before too. NEA-IndoUS’s Vinod Dham, who sits on Montalvo’s board, was one of Intel’s chief chip architects during the Pentium era. He then went to NexGen, which designed an Intel-compatible chip, and AMD when it bought NexGen.

Montalvo’s CEO is Matt Perry, who also served as chief executive of Transmeta, which once tried to take on Intel in notebooks but now largely concentrates on technology licensing. Peter Song, Montalvo’s chief architect, earlier founded a company called MemoryLogix, which tried to build low-power Intel-compatible chips. Other current and former employees include Greg Favor (formerly of NexGen and AMD) and Mike Yamamura. (CNET blogger Peter Glaskowsky is chief systems architect for Montalvo and is listed as a co-inventor on two published Montalvo patent applications, but he was not involved in any way in this story. CNET is the publisher of News.com.)

Some of Montalvo’s patent applications can be viewed here.

Although it has designed a chip, Montalvo has not yet produced a chip based on its designs.

Source: CNET News.com - Business Tech

February 15, 2008 Posted by prolink | Uncategorized | | No Comments